Sunday January 3, 2010 21:39

Cigna Health Denies My 17yr Old Sister’s Insurance Claim

Posted by Business Plan as Insurance

***RIP Sis*** We are holding a Fashion Show in Nataline’s Legacy on July 12th 2008 @ Mercedez-Benz of Calabasas California. More information can be found @ www.myspace.com/fashionlegacy Download The Newly released song for Nataline found in the link below www.myspace.com/natalinesarkisyanbenefit

Related posts:

  1. California Health Insurance: Why a health insurance coverage is important
  2. California Individual Health insurance: Making The Right Decisions on Individual Health Insurance
  3. The Right Place to Get California Health Insurance Quotes
  4. Get Quotes Compare Online Health Insurance Quotation
  5. Is the auto-insurance claim information shared if I switch the insurance company?

Tags: , , , , , ,



25 Responses to Cigna Health Denies My 17yr Old Sister’s Insurance Claim

cod4boy45

January 3rd, 2010 at 10:20 pm

i hope the ceo burns in hell

Hako2004

January 3rd, 2010 at 10:39 pm

Corporations are driven by greed. Their CEOs are only interested in getting rich. Insurance companies don’t care about us, unless they don’t receive ours payment checks. They spend more money on advertising than they do saving seriously ill people that are insured with them.

MZTISH086

January 3rd, 2010 at 10:48 pm

i disagree

i can say its not their fault she died. because its not, but denying a child a liver transplant when she needed is a big mistake CIGNA can make. she had a 65% chance to live. yes they should have granted that to her. but these health companies these days are bogus because theyll kill anyone off just so they can keep money in their pockets. its a shame.

MZTISH086

January 3rd, 2010 at 11:34 pm

yes you are right that disease killed her it wasnt the company, but they are still at fault because they denied her. thats not fair at all. CIGNA told the family that the transplant is not medically necessary…explain to me how they are not wrong.

rowdy916

January 3rd, 2010 at 11:38 pm

cigna murdered this young girl… plain and simple. lets find out where Ed lives and torment him till the the day he dies..

IA5208

January 3rd, 2010 at 11:50 pm

Exactly… you know what would happen…even if the family won a huge lawsuit and Cigna paid out.. they’d just raise the cost of insurance to pay for the suit and the CEO would continue to collect his 73 million! It’s all a bunch of bullshit…and it’s criminal. Until the government stops allowing this kind of business, we’re all powerless

dayglowgreendoor

January 4th, 2010 at 12:37 am

She was murdered. Plain and simple murder by design. CIGNA is a murderer. This family should own CIGNA. Why aren’t there lawyers clamoring to sue these weasels? It’s funny that one of the huge talking points of the Reicht Wing weasels of the RepubliCants is TORT REFORM. This tort reform is supposed to keep people from suing in exactly this situation. Tort Reform for more profits for corrupt and criminal scum like the murderers at CIGNA.

cfcfan1

January 4th, 2010 at 1:36 am

It is so sad that this happens but in America elections are not decided by intelligent people they are decided by idiot who don’t bother to read or look for the truth but wait for that 30sec sound bite and talking heads on radio and tv. That is why we always get the wrong people in office and policies like this remain. As long as we keep looking at tv and listening to raido for information this will never stop.

bistrosidecar

January 4th, 2010 at 2:10 am

By denying a dying girl a liver transplant? Really? That’s the right thing to do? They were given the right to decide who lives or dies and choose their profits over a young girl’s life. It was only when the news cameras came in that they changed their minds (because of losing their profits from bad press) it was too late and she died. That’s disgusting.

bistrosidecar

January 4th, 2010 at 3:05 am

They denied her a liver transplant. She died. It’s their fault, nobody should have the right to decide if another person lives or dies.

JHeroes

January 4th, 2010 at 3:23 am

They agreed to the plan that was agreed to by her parents. Then, when the parents complained and realized THEIR mistake, Cigna paid for the procedure out of pocket! Cigna didn’t kill the girl, the disease did. Cigna didn’t have to pay for the procedure, but they did. How did they do anything WRONG?

Solange822001

January 4th, 2010 at 4:13 am

Please enlighten me, how did they do the right thing?

JHeroes

January 4th, 2010 at 4:43 am

You’d be wrong to assume that I am a conservative or a Republican. Anyone who knows me would tell you that I am very liberal, and disagree with Republicans on most issues, including healthcare. However, I checked the facts on this case, and Cigna did the right thing.

Solange822001

January 4th, 2010 at 4:44 am

You are an idiot. Its stupid people like you that continue to fight against your own best interests. I for one am tired of your stupidity ruining OUR country. Get a brain, or else shut up and let the rest of us run the country~!!!!!

HerrBismarck

January 4th, 2010 at 5:14 am

Thanks for sharing this.

This is what people WITH health care ins. have to think about: you could lose you Ins. in any second! Just like her.

thebangkokfive

January 4th, 2010 at 6:01 am

We cannot have let her die in vein, do not forget this girl. She is a martyr, a symbol of the war we are in against big money and a Republican party hell bent on doing everything possible, including fear mongering, lying, etc. to make sure we lose this fight. DO NOT FORGET THIS GIRL.

phillipmarch22

January 4th, 2010 at 6:25 am

Blue Dog Max Baucus has received $2,797,381 from the health sector and $1,170,313 from the insurance sector. Ummm? Does that tell you anything? I am going to every Max video, and every health care reform video on YouTube and getting this out there! Please do write, email, fax, or call his office to make sure that he understands that we will expose him totally if he does not get on board here!

phillipmarch22

January 4th, 2010 at 7:21 am

I don’t know much about this case, but what did it take for Cigna to decide to pay for the surgery?

boredjoewo

January 4th, 2010 at 7:38 am

Universal Health with Single Payer is the answer. To say no to that is to say YES to more deaths like this. She should not have died. She died because of opposition to Universal Healthcare with Single Payer.

JHeroes

January 4th, 2010 at 8:17 am

How can you call them greedy? If what I understand is true, this procedure was WAY out there, and it’s not Cigna’s faulth that it was not included. In fact, Cigna was being SELFLESS by agreeing to pay for the procedure out of pocket! That doesn’t seem greedy to me!

CorydonFirst

January 4th, 2010 at 8:50 am

Right, But look at the costs of those long term policies. They are real and out there… I cannot afford them. Not on 60 000 a year pay. Insurance in the past was much better.
That is how they make more money,when they don’y pay out. It is more of a business. Not just cigna, they all are like that. I have to agree that they are Greedy. Every year they cover less and less. what else would you call it? Just look at what you pay a month now.

JHeroes

January 4th, 2010 at 9:34 am

I’m sure they paid what they thought would be the best premium for them. They just didn’t know that they would need something else.

JHeroes

January 4th, 2010 at 10:10 am

But here’s the thing. When they signed that premium, they didn’t know that they would need that procedure. It was something that came out of nowhere. It is not Cigna’s fault that the family could not see into the future. If they had known, they could have had it included.

CorydonFirst

January 4th, 2010 at 10:55 am

I really don’t get you. I am not trying to be rude, just trying to understand your logic. It almost seems like you are very happy with health insurance premiums going up and covering less every year. The plan might be the best that was offered through the employer. Does anyone actually see the bottom lines of what is not covered when they sign up when sign up. Regardless of price, if pay for something I just want it to work

CorydonFirst

January 4th, 2010 at 11:36 am

So how do you propose to pay for stuff like this and what will that insurance cost? I am confused as to what you think Healthcare insurance should be. Would it not be nice to pay a premium and just have it covered? I would want this for my family. The big stuff is for when you really need it. Stitches and broken bones are affordable. Should we break it down to have two types of health insurance?What would you do if you needed the procedure and it just wasn’t covered and you could not afford it?